According to independent research the SNP are the only social democratic
party currently active within Scottish politics. Canadian research
places New Labour, the Libdems and the Tories as right of centre parties
with not that much between the Tories and Labour. The research also
indicates New Labour is more authoritarian than either of the other two
right of centre parties in Scotland. The only parties to the left of the SNP, currently, are the Greens and the Scottish Socialists.
In terms of UK politics - we have seen the creation of a two party state whose differences are minimal and similarities huge. The next UK election will see the end of the LibDems as a credible party.
The problem is this model does not work in Scotland where we have a clear choice between a left of centre social democratic party, in the SNP, and a right of centre party, in New Labour. Given the innate conservatism of the Scottish electorate we see the extremes being squeezed: on the left the Greens and SSP, on the right the Tories and Libdems.
The identification of this dynamic is the one we need to look at in the modernisation of Scotland's politics and 'establishment'. Fundamentally the SNP are seen to be driving the modernisation process while New Labour are acting as a right wing reactionary party seeking to retain the status quo, as the only way they can see of 'holding onto power for power's sake'. This is epitomised in their authoritarian stance which presents in Holyrood as opposition to the SNP at every turn. Modernisation in Scotland is happening but is not being lead by political nerds or party politics it is being informed by the wishes of the Scottish people.
The SNP are not 'leading' or 'driving' a thing, they are just cannily riding the wave, using its energy to achieve their goals. On any occasion they have tried to get ahead of the wave, they have been wiped out. Labour in Scotland still think they can stop the wave by some reactionary King Cnut style gesture and that is their weakness. This weakness was identified by Micheal Ignatieff in a BBC interview in which he suggested New Labour could well be washed away for good when Scotland becomes independent.
The debate in Scotland is increasingly about people lead politics and not party politics, as Lesley Riddoch identified yesterday in an article for Newsnet Scotland. The real discussion on Scotland's future, in or outside of the UK, is not happening in the traditional political arenas and media it is happening outside, in public, where the UK right wing parties have no control and no apparent ability to listen.
If we wish to modernise Scotland (and an increasing majority of the Scots electorate do), we, the people will make it happen. The Scottish Tories are increasingly waking up to this reality, turning against Cameron's gal at Holyrood, leaving her increasingly isolated. In McLeish and Chisholm New Labour have two who see the way the wind is blowing but are voiceless within their own party.
There are still 100 weeks left for the centre right parties to espouse their view of a modern Scotland, yet their silence is deafening.
In terms of UK politics - we have seen the creation of a two party state whose differences are minimal and similarities huge. The next UK election will see the end of the LibDems as a credible party.
The problem is this model does not work in Scotland where we have a clear choice between a left of centre social democratic party, in the SNP, and a right of centre party, in New Labour. Given the innate conservatism of the Scottish electorate we see the extremes being squeezed: on the left the Greens and SSP, on the right the Tories and Libdems.
The identification of this dynamic is the one we need to look at in the modernisation of Scotland's politics and 'establishment'. Fundamentally the SNP are seen to be driving the modernisation process while New Labour are acting as a right wing reactionary party seeking to retain the status quo, as the only way they can see of 'holding onto power for power's sake'. This is epitomised in their authoritarian stance which presents in Holyrood as opposition to the SNP at every turn. Modernisation in Scotland is happening but is not being lead by political nerds or party politics it is being informed by the wishes of the Scottish people.
The SNP are not 'leading' or 'driving' a thing, they are just cannily riding the wave, using its energy to achieve their goals. On any occasion they have tried to get ahead of the wave, they have been wiped out. Labour in Scotland still think they can stop the wave by some reactionary King Cnut style gesture and that is their weakness. This weakness was identified by Micheal Ignatieff in a BBC interview in which he suggested New Labour could well be washed away for good when Scotland becomes independent.
The debate in Scotland is increasingly about people lead politics and not party politics, as Lesley Riddoch identified yesterday in an article for Newsnet Scotland. The real discussion on Scotland's future, in or outside of the UK, is not happening in the traditional political arenas and media it is happening outside, in public, where the UK right wing parties have no control and no apparent ability to listen.
If we wish to modernise Scotland (and an increasing majority of the Scots electorate do), we, the people will make it happen. The Scottish Tories are increasingly waking up to this reality, turning against Cameron's gal at Holyrood, leaving her increasingly isolated. In McLeish and Chisholm New Labour have two who see the way the wind is blowing but are voiceless within their own party.
There are still 100 weeks left for the centre right parties to espouse their view of a modern Scotland, yet their silence is deafening.
The only sensible comment came from the veteran republican, Dennis Skinner, "Jubilee year, double dip recession, what a start." In turn this brought forth the usual platitudinous anger from the 'serious' politicians who were happy to ignore threats of physical violence to minority MP's, sexism from Cameron, continuing fraudulent expense claims by MPs and lies from any Minister of the current and past governments you care to mention.
According to Cameron this 'Queen's Keech' was about the Tory vision to rebuild 'Britain' - while continuing to fundamentally ignore the core problems that are breaking up the current parliamentary union.
How is this going to 'rebuild Britain' when there is no acceptance or recognition that both the Scots and Welsh are moving further and further away from 'Cameron's vision of Britain' and increasingly looking to break away?
The 'Big Society' is a smoke screen to hide neo-liberal privatisation of public services in England and cuts to the NHS and Welfare by the back door.
If Cameron was serious about 'rebuilding Britain' he would be talking about a bill to bring forward an English Parliament (including the House of Lards) and a restructuring of the UK Parliament to a confederal status or even a Council of the British Isles and including Eire.
That no one in Labour or the Tories in Westminster is addressing this fundamental democratic deficit in England suggests for all Cameron and Milliband's 'puff and blaw' they accept the SNP have won the independence referendum before it happens and are already scrapping over the remaining carcase of what will be left.
Is that now how the two main Westminster parties now see England - as dead meat to be squabbled over?