There is a core failure by Mr Carrell to understand the constitutional reality of a 'Yes vote' on the continuing legitimacy of the UK Parliament nor the Uk Parliament's inability to morph into a rUK Parliament with out a general election in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The Treaty of Union is clear, the UK Parliament can have no role in any change or alteration to the Treaty of Union - that includes its termination - any changes or alterations can only be agreed between bodies representing the two original, sovereign, signatory parliaments.
It has been pointed out by constitutional experts at Oxford University that for a rUK Parliament to have legal and constitutional legitimacy under English Law and constitutional practice it is required to be voted for by its actual electorate in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Taking the requirement of the Treaty of Union for negotiations between the original, sovereign, signatory parliaments and the need for rUK to have a legitimate parliament; the reality is Cameron will need to call an election to the rUK Parliament by November 2014 at the latest and will be unable to stall to May 2015 let alone any later.
This raises the spectre of UKIP in roads to Tory seats fueled by the 'subsidy junkie Scots' propaganda in England and the London media over the last two years.
What will happen once the EU cat is let out the bag that both Scotland and rUK will be treated as successor states to an existing EU member?
Worse - how loud will the howling and baying for blood be when the Tory right and UKIP register rUK will need to renegotiate its membership, losing MEPs, sinecures in Brussels, juicy commissioner posts, the infamous rebate prior to March 2016 and the termination of the Union - while Cameron will be further marginalised by the EU leaders, looking for pay back, than he is at present?
Double whammy - Cameron loses Scotland in September and then Westminster in November.
Wonder if Ed Miliband and Labour would be that keen to win the upcoming rUK election and its accompanying sack of weasels?
The Treaty of Union is clear, the UK Parliament can have no role in any change or alteration to the Treaty of Union - that includes its termination - any changes or alterations can only be agreed between bodies representing the two original, sovereign, signatory parliaments.
It has been pointed out by constitutional experts at Oxford University that for a rUK Parliament to have legal and constitutional legitimacy under English Law and constitutional practice it is required to be voted for by its actual electorate in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Taking the requirement of the Treaty of Union for negotiations between the original, sovereign, signatory parliaments and the need for rUK to have a legitimate parliament; the reality is Cameron will need to call an election to the rUK Parliament by November 2014 at the latest and will be unable to stall to May 2015 let alone any later.
This raises the spectre of UKIP in roads to Tory seats fueled by the 'subsidy junkie Scots' propaganda in England and the London media over the last two years.
What will happen once the EU cat is let out the bag that both Scotland and rUK will be treated as successor states to an existing EU member?
Worse - how loud will the howling and baying for blood be when the Tory right and UKIP register rUK will need to renegotiate its membership, losing MEPs, sinecures in Brussels, juicy commissioner posts, the infamous rebate prior to March 2016 and the termination of the Union - while Cameron will be further marginalised by the EU leaders, looking for pay back, than he is at present?
Double whammy - Cameron loses Scotland in September and then Westminster in November.
Wonder if Ed Miliband and Labour would be that keen to win the upcoming rUK election and its accompanying sack of weasels?
